Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Middendorf vs Gina Feistel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Middendorf vs Feistel analysis and find out who is favored!
Julia Middendorf vs Gina Feistel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Middendorf 1 - 0 Feistel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Middendorf has won 45.47% of points on his second serve, while Feistel has won 46.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Middendorf, in recent form, has won 52.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Feistel has won 57.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.33% and 45.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Middendorf has saved 55.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Feistel has saved 52.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Middendorf has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Feistel winning 67.19% (W/L 43/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Middendorf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Feistel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 41/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Middendorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.06% of matches (W/L 37/ 29), where as Feistel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Middendorf winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Middendorf winning 2 and Feistel winning 0. The last match between Middendorf and Feistel was at the W50 Porto, 29-01-2024, Q3, I.hard with Julia Middendorf getting the victory 6-1 2-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Middendorf and Feistel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Middendorf winning 0 times and Feistel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Middendorf winning 0, and Feistel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Middendorf has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.19 while Feistel has played against players with an average rank of 267.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Middendorf has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Feistel has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Middendorf has converted 47.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Feistel has converted 45.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
377
Rank
347
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
488
Rank
488
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
58% (106-76)
Career Total W/L
62% (76-46)
48% (13-14)
YTD W/L
68% (19-9)
$5,362
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Middendorf VS Feistel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Julia Middendorf | Gina Feistel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 8 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:43:0 | 0:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (12/23) | 77% (27/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (8/12) | 41% (11/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 13% (1/8) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (23/35) | 35% (8/23) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Middendorf VS Feistel H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Julia Middendorf
Player
Gina Feistel
52%
(
12 of
23)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
38
Total Points Won
20
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Middendorf | Gina Feistel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (13/14) | 68% (19/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (29/30) | 60% (41/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (256/269) | 54% (342/288) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 82% (14/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 86 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 216.93 | 323.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (942/1505) | 72% (1489/2081) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (582/942) | 57% (845/1489) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (256/563) | 47% (277/592) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (75/159) | 46% (146/320) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (646/1508) | 50% (1099/2217) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (12/13) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (9/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 68% (19/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 67% (8/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 75% (9/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (16/2) | 47% (15/7) |
Julia Middendorf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Julia Middendorf
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Julia Victoria Rennert
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Svetac
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Alana Subasic
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Julia Middendorf
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Julia Middendorf
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Mariani
Player
Julia Middendorf
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Julia Middendorf
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Dea Herdzelas
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Middendorf
Player
Micol Salvadori
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gina Feistel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
82%
(
83 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Sarafina Olivia Hansen
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Gina Feistel
69%
(
91 of
132)
1st Serve %
71%
(
69 of
97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
52%
(
68 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Vivian Wolff
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Victoria Kan
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Gina Feistel
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
84%
(
127 of
151)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
64 of
127)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
74 of
151)
141
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Barbora Palicova
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Mona Barthel
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
56 of
114)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
100
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Middendorf Vs Feistel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gina Feistel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
